WireShark 2.2.2: 30 bug fixes


WireShark is the most popular network protocol analyzer. Admins use it mostly for troubleshooting, developers for testing new protocols, and it’s also a very good tool for educational purpose.
But, like all software in the world, it contains bugs. if you use the version 2.2.1, you may have found some problem, but even if don’t, you should be glad to know that the team released an update, porting WireShark at 2.2.2 version and bringing 30 security and bug fixes.


Following, the complete list of bug fixes:

  • TCP: nextseq incorrect if TCP_MAX_UNACKED_SEGMENTS exceeded & FIN true.
  • TCP: nextseq incorrect if TCP_MAX_UNACKED_SEGMENTS exceeded & FIN true.
  • dmg for OS X does not install man pages.
  • Fails to compile against Heimdal 1.5.3.
  • TCP: Next sequence number off by one when sending payload in SYN packet (e.g. TFO).
  • Follow TCP Stream shows duplicate stream data.
  • Dissection engine falsely asserts that EIGRP packet’s checksum is incorrect.
  • IEEE 802.15.4 frames erroneously handed over to ZigBee dissector.
  • Capture Filter Bookmark Inactive in Capture Options page.
  • CLNP dissector does not parse ER NPDU properly.
  • SNMP trap bindings for NON scalar OIDs.
  • BGP LS Link Protection Type TLV (1093) decoding.
  • Application crash sorting column for tcp.window_size_scalefactor up and down.
  • ZigBee Green Power add key during execution.
  • Malformed AMPQ packets for session.expected and session.confirmed fields.
  • Wireshark 2.2.1 crashes when attempting to merge pcap files.
  • [IS-637A] SMS – Teleservice layer parameter -→ IA5 encoded text is not correctly displayed.
  • Failure to dissect USB Audio feature unit descriptors missing the iFeature field.
  • MSISDN not populated/decoded in JSON GTP-C decoding.
  • E212: 3 digits MNC are identified as 2 digits long if they end with a 0.
  • Exception with last unknown Cisco AVP available in a SCCRQ message.
  • TShark stalls on FreeBSD if androiddump is present.
  • Dissector skips DICOM command.
  • UUID (FT_GUID) filtering isn’t working.
  • Manufacturer name resolution fail.
  • packet-sdp.c allocates transport_info→encoding_name from wrong memory pool.
  • Payload type name for dynamic payload is wrong for reverse RTP channels.

Not only fixing bug

Along with these important fixes, WireShark 2.2.2 introduces also updates in 6LoWPAN, AllJoyn, AMPQ, ANSI IS-637 A, BGP, CLNP, DCERPC, DICOM, DTN, E.212, EIGRP, ERF, GVSP, IEEE 802.11, IEEE 802.15.4, IP, ISO-8583, Kerberos, L2TP, LACP, MAC LTE, OpenFlow, Profinet I/O, RTPS, SCTP, SDP, Skype, SMPP, SNA, SNMP, SPNEGO, TCP, USB Audio, XML, and ZigBee protocols support.

Getting WireShark

So, if you need WireShark (and maybe you do), this is a “must-have” update.
Installation packages and source code can be found at the official website download page.

  • tucker-claire

    I was paid $104k in 2016 by working from my home a­­n­­d I did it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r 3 or sometimes more h a day. I was following an earning model I found online and I am happy that i made such great money. It’s very newbie-friendly a­n­d I’m so thankful that i discovered it. Here is what i do… STATICTAB.COM/owgxpdb

  • I’ve earned $104,000 in last 12 months by freelancing from home a­­n­­d I did that by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part time f­o­r few hours daily. I was following a business opportunity I was introduced by this company i found online and I am so happy that i made so much extra income. It’s very beginner-friendly a­­n­­d I am just so happy that i discovered this. Here is what i do… TWITTER.COM/StinnettMargar1/status/836191059310866432

  • david.thrasher

    I was paid 104000 dollars past year by doing an internet job and also I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r several hours every day. I applied job opportunity I found out on the internet and therefore I am delighted that I was capable to earn such decent money. It’s seriously newbie-friendly and I’m so pleased that I discovered out regarding it. Go and visit exactly what I do… www­.­cat­.­org­.­uk/snip/93439

  • M­a­n­y p­e­o­ple desire t­o ha­v­e a passive earnings at h­o­me, bu­t t­he­y don’t have much idea ho­w t­o exactly d­o th­at o­n th­e Int­ernet. Th­ere ar­e a many w­ays t­o ea­rn big am­ount of mo­ney, b­ut wh­enev­er p­eopl­e t­ry th­at the­y g­et tr­app­ed in a s­cam, Therefore Now I am sh­aring wi­th yo­u a g­enuine an­d gu­arante­ed w­ay f­or fre­e to ea­rn hug­e am­ount of mon­ey a­t ho­me.I am making atleast $10000 each month since 1 year.Its an on-line job and also hassle-free to do, Even a little child can do this work and make money. If you want a happy and rich life then you need to copy and paste this internet site in web browser and then follow instructions to get started today and earn Thousands On the internet……….. http://shrty­.­link/SaukLy

  • I have been on numerous systems but nothing at all worked for me in a proper manner. Lastly in 2012 I came across a system which is crazy. It is extremely simple and easy to setup and I began promoting it within few mins.This system works and is perfect for every person regardless of age group,educational background or work-related skills.You can get immediate results even if you feel like you have sup-par computer skills.I have earned $1000 in my initial 7 days and after that I am making $10000 or even more month after month.Thank you for creating this amazing system that is perfect for the average person >>>> http://deliciousurl­.­com//1g