Google Plus

LibreOffice and OpenOffice reach the Crossroads – differ by 7.7 million new code lines

Written by anuradha.shukla on . Posted in Software

Yes, LibreOffice did fork away from OpenOffice in September of 2010. Open Office, then was the default standard in office suites for open source software and had a large user-base. Besides, it was a strong contender against proprietary software such as Microsoft Word. After Oracle bought Sun Microsystems, the parent company of OpenOffice, it initially, remained non-committal on continuing as a free software suite. This prompted developers of OpenOffice code to start afresh with LibreOffice Project, under The Documentation Foundation.

Later, in June 2011, Oracle donated the OpenOffice Project to Apache Software Foundation and is now grows under their aegis.

Doubters believed LibreOffice would be an OpenOffice clone

The differences between both the projects in September 2010 were more organizational in nature than any distinctions in actual codes.

As LIbreOffice was born, more out of a need to retain continuity of the Open Source philosophy, many believed that, LibreOffice would simply remain a clone of OpenOffice software and reflect its code.

Doubters vindicted with LibreOffice recent sprucing codelines

Now LibreOffice is building up pace and last week has added some 7.7 new million new code lines, doing away with some 5.3K, which were defunct. Now burnished and revamped, it is sleeker, faster and provides greater value, in comparison to either OpenOffice or even Microsoft Word.

Michel Meeks, comments in his blog that the differences in code between LibreOffice and OpenOffice is now becoming wider. In future, It will probably become increasingly difficult to port code between the two products as the differences could well run into several million code-lines.

LibreOffice sleeker, faster and more enabled

Meeks mentions in the post that, legacies and defunct codelines for OS/2; code to connect Adabas database in OpenOffice/StarOffice; about 100 import/export binfilters used in ealier OOo versions are now all killed to make space for better codelines.

The latest LibreOffice inclusions are improvements in VBA; sprucing the gtk3 code; introducing newer RTF filter and a new filter for the Lotus Word Pro.

A whole lot of feature work in the new files being added has increased the net work input. All these changes are largely with respect to common files and are indicator of the amount of code-change happening.

It is assumed that, this could give rise to conflicts when merge changes occur. This would be true, if as per convention all Apache Open Office code committed were reflected in LibreOffice as well.

The gulf will increase

In future, it would be rather wrong to assume that, there would be a corresponding code committed in LibreOffice, every time there is a change in OpenOffice code. The codelines are going to become more specific to LibreOffice.

It is most likely that, LibreOffice would ‘cherry-pick’, only meaningful OpenOffice changes to be included in LibreOffice.

LibreOffice will soon be default office suite

LibreOffice is now passing the crossroads with OpenOffice. With the open source community developers behind it, it is most likely that the codelines gulf between both will increase and help LIbreOffice achieve its goals.

For questions please refer to our Q/A forum at : http://ask.unixmen.com

Like us on Facebook

This week Top Posts

Write for us

Recent Comments

Ladi Oyekanmi

|

Could you please assist in step by step on how to install nagios on solaris

Adhraa

|

Greate tutorial :)

pigmej

|

Just one thing:

What about pep8 in your python code ? How can you give ‘tutorials’ on quite popular website, of such a bad quality ?

Amit Rai

|

I just renamed shared.xml and it logged in and created a new shared.xml.

DB Griffin

|

Larry Page is not being completely honest! The manner in which the PRISM program/project works does not need access from company administrators or owners, so called “direct access”; the access to the information is already there. These tech company CEOs take for granted the actual intelligence of most end users of their products. All it takes is a little digging and reading to go from ignorant to informed on these things especially on exactly how the internet works/functions in the U.S.A. I find Larry Page’s remarks just as laughable as Al Gore’s claim to “inventing” the internet/world wide web!

If you, as an end user, are reading this post; I challenge you to research these matters yourself. It really is quite simple with all the “information sites” that exist on the web today ie Wikipedia, & other online encyclopedias that actually list source material, as well as highly respected tech sites and blogs that also list their source material. Be warned: this is only the tip of the iceberg and these tech CEOs know and understand this; they are scrambling in attempt to perform DAMAGE CONTROL to save the company and what little trust thay have left from their products end users/consumers.

Am I a skeptic? I believe someone has to be or needs to be at this point in time! If your not just a little skeptical of the government, tech companies, and the people that are in charge of these agencies and companies; you need to be, even if just a little skeptic. For your own personal protection and security! I know I was a part of this community for over 14 years!

 
IDG Tech Network
Copyright © 2008-2013 Unixmen.com .
Maintained by Anblik .