Firefox 5 Should have been Firefox 4.02!

Mozilla has officially released Firefox 5, only 3 months after the releases of Firefox 4 following the rapid release strategy of Google Chrome. The idea behind is to bring about changes in the browser as soon as possible and keep the browser up-to-date by creating different development channels. But we see that there are no significant changes in the browser, design or any dramatic improvement. This poses a question, whether or not, Firefox firefox_icon5 should have been Firefox 4.1.0 or Firefox4.0.2?

As we have already reviewed in the last post that there are some tweaks under the hood and no significant changes in the UI and design. The major (yet under-the-hood) improvements in the new browser include:

1- Do Not Track Feature: This feature will improve privacy of the browser. The feature is now easily accessible via Privacy Menu (than hidden under Advanced Options) 2- Added security to WebGL: After Microsoft’s blunt allegation that WebGL is a severity threat to web-severity; Mozilla’s security enhancement is definitely a good enhancement.

3- Support for CSS Animations & improved standards support for HTML5, XHR, MathML, SMIL, and canvas

4- Firefox 5 on Android devices has a better page-load-speed and will load webpages in shorter time particularly on 3G networks. The IP version 6 support is also included. What about the speed? Apparently the memory issues with Firefox 4 have been resolved and the new browser version is small and quicker! Nevertheless, some speed and performance test undertaken by experts around the web, show that the browser is lagging behind Google Chrome and even IE 9. There are certainly no notable changes, like the ones witnessed by the users when upgrading from Firefox 3 to Firefox 4. For most of us, no enhancement in the UI means no significant improvement: and unfortunately Firefox 5 does not have any! Additionally the new browser won’t support most of your add-ons too. Users earlier too had been confronted to this situation when upgrading from FF V3 to FF V4: where their favorite add-ons were not supported in the new browser. In our post “7 Firefox Add ons for improvement of security”; we investigated that even some top-rated add-ons were not supported for Firefox 4, bunch of weeks after FF4 debuted, even though FF 4 was a major release. Now just 3 months after the issue, FF users are again facing the same annoyance! Though Firefox 5 has some encouraging improvements yet, in my view, FF 5 does not have the right to be called FF5 and should have been FF 4.02! What do you think?

{module user9-footer}


  • Nadav

    Firefox 4 should be Firefox 10!

    to save silly frequent major releases.

    And claim that firefox 4 so good so it consider 10.

    Nullsufost did the same in winamp 4 to 5

  • Nadav

    Nullsufost did the same in winamp *3* to 5

  • http://enteryoursiteURL... Vadan

    do you mean nullsoft ?

  • Mohan

    Just Chrome 12 should be Chrome 2.

  • darkduck

    [url=]Quick review of Firefox 5 when it was still in Beta, but already in Ubuntu proposed repository.[/url]

  • http://enteryoursiteURL... Elder-Geek

    Firefox is doing what they need to do. Back in the day Slackware jumped from 3.9/4 to 7. Why, because they were conservative with their numbering and did a very good job at keeping compatibility with old versions. You should only roll version numbers when things are really incompatible. So Slackware was on 4 and RedHat was on 6. To the casual observer, it looked like RedHat had to be much more advanced. So Pat jumped to verson 7 to get things more evenly matched. Now we are at Slackware 13 and Fedora 15. The jump was good.

    The way Google is naming things they are on 12, with 14 being the next version. Even with moving to Firefox 7 by the end of the year, That puts Firefox way behind in the perception game of who has the newest and best browser.

    And yes, that preception counts